Rob The Hockey Guy

// A Vancouver Canucks Hockey Blog

Canucks trade Cody Hodgson and I don’t like it

Mike Gillis sent shockwaves through Canuck nation on trade deadline day. In the biggest deal of the day, Gillis sent Cody Hodgson and Alex Sulzer to the Buffalo Sabres for Zack Kassian and Marc-Andre Gragnani. I think like a lot of people, I was immediately confused by this trade. So I sat down, weighed the pros and cons, looked at it from all angles and I still don’t like it.

Lets take a look at what the Canucks are getting:

Zack Kassian

Kassian is the key to the deal for the Canucks. He was the 13th overall pick in the 2009 draft and starred in the 2011 World Junior Championships for Canada. At 6’3″, 214 lbs, he’s a big power forward and projects to be exactly what the Canucks need. He’s mean and nasty and can score. He had 77 points in 56 games in junior last year and has put up very good numbers in the AHL (26 points in 30 games) as a rookie. He has only played in 27 NHL games with the Sabres this year, notching 7 points while averaging about 12 minutes of ice time per game.

The Canucks are likely hoping that Kassian can be big, mean and provide a scoring touch, playing on their third line. If he’s able to do that, he’ll give the Canucks a dimension that they don’t have currently. Of course, he’s still a rookie so the jury is still out on whether or not he can carry the mail.

I asked Eric Schmitz, a Sabres blogger at 3rd Man In, how he felt about Zack Kassian and here’s how our conversation went:

Rob: “You ought to be thrilled to get Cody Hodgson”

Eric: “I definitely am. I’m very high on him, was hoping to get him in his draft year.”

Rob: “think you did ok with Myers”

Eric: “Yeah, it worked out in the end I think hahaha”

Rob: “do you think Kassian is ready to play full-time in the NHL right now?”

Eric: “He has shown the skills. Great down low at defending the puck, good hands. Just rarely throws his weight around.”

So those are hardly rave reviews, especially when you consider that he hasn’t scored a lot yet. Before speaking with Eric, I got the impression that Kassian was a big guy that wasn’t ready to score at the NHL level yet, but was certainly ready to throw big hits.

Marc-Andre Gragnani

Gragnani is a 24 year old offensive minded defenceman playing in his first full NHL season. He has 12 points in 44 games this year, but first burst onto the scene late last year. Gragnani only played in 9 regular season games for Buffalo last year, but he had 7 points in 7 games in the playoffs. Gragnani averaged 22 minutes of ice time per game in last year’s playoffs, good enough for third most on the Sabres. The question on Gragnani for me is if he was treated fairly this year. Was his drop in ice time unfair or was it warranted? The numbers would suggest to me that he should have been given more playing time, but high priced newcomers like Christian Ehrhoff and Robyn Regehr caused his reduced responsibility.

Analyzing the Trade

In many ways this is a bizarre trade, because people aren’t sure if this is a trade for the future or a trade for the present. In my opinion, the best player in the deal is Cody Hodgson in the short term, and in the long term. He was more highly touted than Kassian as a junior player and has proven more at the NHL level. Hodgson has shown enough to believe that he is going to be a star player one day, and is a very useful player today. Kassian’s ability for this season is undetermined, and long term is not a sure bet either. I hope that Mike Gillis believes that Zack Kassian will be a better player than Cody Hodgson in the long run, because that will determine the winner of this trade.

In this trade, the Canucks have made a decision that they needed to go with a grittier, more defensive third line in the playoffs. I think Alain Vigneault would have been hesitant to play Hodgson as much in the playoffs, and I think they need a checking line. But to give up on Cody Hodgson to make this happen I believe is an unnecessary risk.

Hodgson may not be your prototypical third line centre, but I think he could have learnt to play the wing, if that was the main concern. If you’re going to trade a guy like Hodgson, I would have preferred to see players with fewer question marks coming back. In this trade, Mike Gillis has managed to make me less confident in the short term and the long term.

But there is hope. The Canucks needed to get grittier and Zack Kassian certainly does that. They needed to get more depth on defence, and they did with Gragnani. Sami Pahlsson, acquired earlier from the Blue Jackets, will determine the success of this trade in the short term, as he will likely take over the third line centre spot. If Pahlsson is a better all-around third line centre in the playoffs than Hodgson would have been and if Gragnani can improve their defence and if Kassian can play on the third line, then the Canucks will have a better chance to win the Stanley Cup. And if the Canucks can win the Stanley Cup in 2012, nothing Cody Hodgson can do will make Mike Gillis regret the trade.

Related Posts

5 Response to Canucks trade Cody Hodgson and I don’t like it

  1. KellyG on February 28, 2012

    I dunno Rob, Hodgson was never going to get the icetime that he deserved, there was no way that he's big and strong enough to be a winger and he's not taking any icetime away from Kes or Hank anytime soon. I think they addressed two issues with this trade they got grittier (yet to be proven) and they got more depth in defense which is something that i think they need. Salo is due for an injurey *knock on wood*

    Reply
  2. mickey on February 28, 2012

    I miss CoHo already :(

    Reply
  3. Rob on February 28, 2012

    Sort of agree Kelly. My problem with this is that they could have gotten grittier and get more depth on defence without trading Hodgson. And how gritty did they really get with Kassian? If he's not good enough right now, then I don't know. In 3 years he should be good, but they are built to win the cup now.

    Reply
  4. cocoliew on February 29, 2012

    Outside of a few nice goals in January, I do not think that Cody Hodgson had the foot speed to get to the next level in the NHL. Love his vision and use of wingers, but his skating didn't strike fear in me. He needs good wingers, as he has always had good ones when he had good success (Duschene in Brampton and Taveres in WJC). I do think that there was something else that caused Coho to be traded. I think that there was some residual effect from 2009 and some mistrust fostered there for sure.

    Reply
  5. Rob on February 29, 2012

    ^ He is a rookie of the year candidate getting low minutes and playing with 3rd liners, so I don't know where you can come up with that conclusion. The kid is going to be a star in my opinion. He'll be a first line centre or an excellent second line centre at worst if you ask me.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.