Forsberg to Vancouver? Maybe…

It’s that time of year again folks. Yep, the time of year that Mike Gillis tries to coax an aging Swedish future hall of fame centre to not retire and come to Vancouver. Peter Forsberg played in the Karjala Cup tournament in Helsinki this week, and is apparently contemplating a return to the NHL and possibly play in the 2010 Olympics this February. And Mike Gillis is interested.
The issue with Forsberg is of course his health. If he’s healthy, he’s still a very good player, but nagging foot problems have plagued him over the last bunch of years. So where will Forsberg land? Not Philadelphia according to reports. There are also rumours that he’s considering the KHL, but I would find that hard to believe. The Canucks should have the cap space to sign him because of Demitra’s injury, but would Forsberg consider Vancouver out of loyalty to the Avalanche? In the past he has reportedly felt that way, but lots has changed since then. Both teams have completely revamped rosters (gone are the likes of Bertuzzi, Cooke, Ruutu for the Canucks and Sakic, Roy, etc for the Avs), and are no longer the bitter rivals they once were. I’d still consider the Canucks a long shot to get him, but it sure would be nice to see him in a Vancouver uniform.
Imagine what a healthy Forsberg could do for the Vancouver lineup:
Sedin-Sedin-Burrows
Demitra-Kesler-Raymond
Samuelsson-Forsberg-Bernier
Those are three pretty potent scoring lines. If he gets injured, you throw Wellwood into his spot, and you’re back to where you are now.

TEAM 1410 Sports Radio
That’s right, there’s a new all-sports radio station in Vancouver, and it can be found on 1410 AM. It appears that it will be the home for the BC Lions as well as some US syndicated shows such as the Jim Rome Show. Pretty good idea if you ask me.

The current Team 1040 lineup has a lot of the same kind of show with the same kind of guests. I love listening to it, but sometimes it’s nice to hear about, say, the World Series instead of the Calgary Flames’ H1N1 flu shots.

Schneider in Goal Tonight
No, not Mathieu Schneider (wouldn’t be too surprising considering all the positions Canucks defencemen are playing lately), but Cory Schneider will get the start in goal tonight against Dallas. A little surprising considering how well Andrew Raycroft has been in goal this year (did you know he’s first in GAA and 2nd in SV% this year?!). The move is probably a good one, considering that the last time Raycroft played in the 2nd of back-to-back games he was pulled.
Related Posts
7334 Responsehttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.robthehockeyguy.com%2F2009%2F11%2F06%2Fforsberg-to-vancouver-maybe%2FForsberg+to+Vancouver%3F+Maybe...2009-11-06+19%3A27%3A45Robhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.canuckz.com%2F%3Fp%3D733 to Forsberg to Vancouver? Maybe…
Leave a Reply or Cancel reply
-
-
Recent PostsPopular PostsComments
-
Why the Canucks are Terrible in Shootouts
February 4, 2012
35842 commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.robthehockeyguy.com%2F2012%2F02%2F04%2Fwhy-the-canucks-are-terrible-in-shootouts%2FWhy+the+Canucks+are+Terrible+in+Shootouts2012-02-04+07%3A50%3A14Robhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.robthehockeyguy.com%2F%3Fp%3D3584
-
Brenden Morrow… Could They? Would They?
January 31, 2012
35792 commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.robthehockeyguy.com%2F2012%2F01%2F31%2Fbrenden-morrow-could-they-would-they%2FBrenden+Morrow...+Could+They%3F+Would+They%3F2012-01-31+04%3A53%3A43Robhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.robthehockeyguy.com%2F%3Fp%3D3579
-
The Daily Show Presents: The Boston Bruins are Hypocrites
January 19, 2012
35694 commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.robthehockeyguy.com%2F2012%2F01%2F19%2Fthe-daily-show-presents-the-boston-bruins-are-hypocrites%2FThe+Daily+Show+Presents%3A+The+Boston+Bruins+are+Hypocrites2012-01-19+07%3A35%3A08Robhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.robthehockeyguy.com%2F%3Fp%3D3569
-
Chris Tanev, Your Time is NOW
January 19, 2012
35640 commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.robthehockeyguy.com%2F2012%2F01%2F19%2Fchris-tanev-your-time-is-now%2FChris+Tanev%2C+Your+Time+is+NOW2012-01-19+07%3A05%3A31Robhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.robthehockeyguy.com%2F%3Fp%3D3564
-
Ryan Kesler December 2009 Calendar Wallpaper!!!
November 30, 2009
77324 commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.robthehockeyguy.com%2F2009%2F11%2F30%2Fryan-kesler-december-2009-calendar-wallpaper%2FRyan+Kesler+December+2009+Calendar+Wallpaper%21%21%212009-11-30+10%3A12%3A02Binh+Hohttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.canuckz.com%2F%3Fp%3D773
-
Bieksa to Columbus? Got to Love Offseason Rumours
July 2, 2010
169120 commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.robthehockeyguy.com%2F2010%2F07%2F02%2Fbieksa-to-columbus-got-to-love-offseason-rumours%2FBieksa+to+Columbus%3F+Got+to+Love+Offseason+Rumours2010-07-02+19%3A17%3A52Robhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.canuckz.com%2F%3Fp%3D1691
-
Concerning Stats Making Canuck Nation Uneasy Before Game 6 In Nashville
May 8, 2011
280916 commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.robthehockeyguy.com%2F2011%2F05%2F08%2Fconcerning-stats-making-canuck-nation-uneasy-before-game-6-in-nashville%2FConcerning+Stats+Making+Canuck+Nation+Uneasy+Before+Game+6+In+Nashville2011-05-09+06%3A26%3A26Robhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.canuckz.com%2F%3Fp%3D2809
-
Mitchell Talks with Team, a New Assistant Coach, more Larscheid Rumours and more!
August 5, 2010
177314 commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.robthehockeyguy.com%2F2010%2F08%2F05%2Fmitchell-talks-with-team%2FMitchell+Talks+with+Team%2C+a+New+Assistant+Coach%2C+more+Larscheid+Rumours+and+more%212010-08-05+20%3A09%3A54Robhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.canuckz.com%2F%3Fp%3D1773
-
Oh man, you're telling me. Glad I could revers... February 5, 2012 by Rob
-
How ironic is it that you created this post ju... February 4, 2012 by mickey
-
I absolutely blame him for leaving and if he w... February 3, 2012 by Rob
-
This is kinda funny because I traded for Morro... February 1, 2012 by Vancan19
-

-
Forsberg is a great hockey player when he isn't injured. Even if he is fit to play again I wouldn't take a chance on him. Not to sound like a pessimist, but he's bound to get injured again. I don't think the Canucks need to add another person to the injury list.
Forsberg is a great hockey player when he isn’t injured. Even if he is fit to play again I wouldn’t take a chance on him. Not to sound like a pessimist, but he’s bound to get injured again. I don’t think the Canucks need to add another person to the injury list.
But if they acquire him, they don't have to give up anyone. So if they bring him in and he gets injured, then they're back to square one, aren't they? How can they lose?
But if they acquire him, they don’t have to give up anyone. So if they bring him in and he gets injured, then they’re back to square one, aren’t they? How can they lose?